Legal Opinion
Connolly v. Bell
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 7, 1955PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, J.
Plaintiffs moved for summary judgment in the Supreme Court, New York County, in an action on a judgment previously rendered in the State of New Jersey. The primary issue is whether the New Jersey judgment is entitled to full faith and credit in New York. (U. S. Const., art. IV, § 1; U. S. Code, tit. 28, § 1738.)
The New Jersey action was instituted in December, 1948, by the Governor and Attorney-General of the State of New Jersey to set aside the acquisition of two toll bridges across the Delaware Biver by the Burlington County Bridge Commission in October, 1948. The facts in the action are…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Loucks v. . Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Wisconsin v. Pelican InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Fauntleroy v. LumSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Connolly v. BellNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
- Republic of the Philippines v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
- Kupersmidt v. New York Telephone Co.New York Supreme Court · 1967
- Meyner v. Burlington-Bristol Bridge Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Chapman v. ChapmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957