Meyer v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLSEY, District Judge.
My decision in this cause is that there must be a final decree dismissing without costs the bill of complaint herein on the ground that this court is without subject-matter jurisdiction of the controversy therein set forth.
I. As this is a court of limited jurisdiction, the first matter always to be decided in respect of any action or suit is whether the court has subject-matter jurisdiction thereof. Questions of venue, of jurisdiction of the persons of the defendants, of the plaintiff’s locus standi, and as to whether a cause of action is stated or not should not be…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Strawbridge v. CurtissSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
- Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Levering & Garrigues Co. v. MorrinSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Missouri v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Tucker v. New Orleans Laundries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1949
- Downing v. HowardDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1946
- McGrier v. P. Ballantine & SonsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1942
- In re St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1944
- Neet v. HolmesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1940