Legal Opinion

Downing v. Howard

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided October 18, 1946No. Civil Action 457PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEAHY, District Judge.

The major question for decision is whether this action is simply a traditional stockholder’s derivative suit based upon a breach of fiduciary duties by officers and directors acting under an unlawful conspiracy to waste assets with other defendants or whether this action is brought to enforce any duty or liability created under the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935. This is the first time the question has been put and everyone shares my inability to find a controlling authority on the first two alleged causes of action.

1. While the complaint charges the action…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Thomson v. GaskillSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Indianapolis v. Chase Nat. BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. City of Indianapolis v. Chase National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. North American Co. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Electric Bond & Share Co. v. Securities & Exchange Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. J. John Brouk, James J. Mullen, Jr., W. Munro Roberts, Jr. v. Managed Funds, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
  2. Downing v. HowardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
  3. Speed v. Transamerica CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1947
  4. Davis v. SmithDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1954
  5. Carlson v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API