Matter of Parental Rights as to Bow
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*142OPINION
By the Court,
Rose, J.:
On May 31, 1995, the district court terminated the parental rights of appellant Adrina Francis Decespedes Recodo (Recodo) after concluding that Recodo was an unfit parent and had failed to adjust to become a suitable parent within a reasonable period of time. Recodo challenges the district court’s conclusion, arguing that no clear and convincing evidence existed to support such a *143conclusion. Recodo also argues that her due process rights were violated because she was not appointed counsel at all stages of the termination proceedings.
We conclude that clear and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Champagne v. WELFARE DIV. OF NEV. STATE DEPT.Nevada Supreme Court · 1984
- Drury v. LangNevada Supreme Court · 1989
- Kobinski v. State, Welfare Div.Nevada Supreme Court · 1987
- Weinper v. Nevada State Department of Human ResourcesNevada Supreme Court · 1996
3Cited by14 opinions
- Letesheia O. v. State, Division of Child & Family ServicesNevada Supreme Court · 2005
- Drummond v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Matter of Parental Rights as to NJNevada Supreme Court · 2000
- Cooley v. STATE, DEPT. HUM. RES.Nevada Supreme Court · 1997
- In Re Parental Rights as to NDONevada Supreme Court · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.