Legal Opinion

Minnehoma Financial Co. v. Pauli

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1977No. 4737PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSE, Justice.

The principal question presented by this appeal is whether a mobile home park operator is entitled to a storage lien, under § 29-115, W.S.1957, C.1967, on a mobile home which is abandoned on his property by a tenant. We will hold that he is entitled to a lien and thereby affirm the decision of the trial court. We will also deny the appellees’ motion to dismiss the appeal.

Appellant-Minnehoma Financial Company initiated this action against Appellees— Adam C. Pauli, Jr., and Joe E. Coulter for conversion of a mobile home in which appellant had a security interest. Pauli asserts…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Walter Jaconski v. Avisun Corporation and W. v. Pangborne & Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
  2. Bluejacket v. CarneyWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Knudson v. HilzerWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Shrum v. ZeltwangerWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Hunter v. Farmers Insurance GroupWyoming Supreme Court · 1976

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Pfeiffer v. Georgia Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
  2. Reno Livestock Corp. v. Sun Oil Co.(Delaware)Wyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  3. O'DONNELL v. City of CasperWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Weaver v. Blue Cross-Blue ShieldWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Franklin Financial v. New Empire Development Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1983

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API