Goff v. Elde
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, C. J.
The amendment to plaintiff’s complaint was permitted in order to conform the complaint to the evidence received: Such amendments are liberally allowed and the trial court’s ruling is largely discretionary. This court will not interfere with .the trial court’s ruling unless there is a clear abuse of discretion. No question is raised about the materiality of the amendment. Defendants do not complain that they were surprised. The purpose of the amendment and the evidence was to show that the legal rate of speed approaching the intersection where the collision occurred was 15 miles per hour.
“(3)…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Morrill v. RountreeOregon Supreme Court · 1965
- Paxton-Mitchell Co. v. Royal Indemnity Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Williams v. International Harvester Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1943
- Graf v. Don Rasmussen Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- Tracy & Baker v. City of AstoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1951
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.