Legal Opinion

Goodman v. American Casualty Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 13, 1994PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

This is the second of three cases decided today in which a household member, having his or her own Massachusetts automobile insurance policy, seeks to recover under the higher underinsurance motorist coverage provided in a spouse’s or parent’s automobile insurance policy. See Depina v. Safety Ins. Co., ante 135 (1994); Smart v. Safety Ins. Co., post 144 (1994). We conclude, as we did in the Depina case, *139that a household member who has a Massachusetts automobile policy of her own providing underinsured motorist coverage may not recover underinsured motorist benefits under a policy issued to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Automobile Mutual Insurance v. YoulerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Johnson Controls, Inc. v. BowesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  3. Royal-Globe Insurance v. CravenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  4. Moore v. Metropolitan Property & Liability InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  5. Plymouth Rock Assurance Corp. v. McAlpineMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. PAJ, Inc. v. Hanover Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Ruggerio Ambulance Service, Inc. v. National Grange Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  3. Berkshire Mutual Insurance v. BurbankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  4. Elena Given v. Commerce InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  5. Cheschi v. Boston Edison Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1995

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API