Legal Opinion

Mony Securities Corp. v. Durham

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided July 18, 2002No. 13-02-185-CVPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

YANEZ, Justice.

In these consolidated proceedings, MONY Securities Corporation complains of the trial court’s denial of its motion to compel arbitration and to stay litigation, which invoked the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA). 1 We dismiss MONY’s interlocutory appeal, but conditionally grant their request for mandamus relief.

BACKGROUND

In 1995, John Durham opened an investment account with MONY, for the purposes of buying and selling financial securities. Included in the new account form which Durham signed, is an agreement to arbitrate any controversy between Durham and MONY. On November…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Prudential Securities Inc. v. MarshallTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  3. EZ Pawn Corp. v. ManciasTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  4. In Re Oakwood Mobile Homes, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
  5. In Re Bruce Terminix Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. In Re D. Wilson Const. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Williams Industries, Inc. v. Earth Development Systems Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
  3. In Re Merrill Lynch Trust Co. FSB, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2003
  4. Cappadonna Electrical Management v. Cameron County, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2005
  5. Merrill Lynch Trust Co. FSB v. Alaniz, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API