Wiemeyer v. Southern Trust & Commerce Bank
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
AMES, J., pro tem.
Respondents filed a complaint in the Superior Court of San Diego County for the purpose of foreclosing a mortgage upon real property. A demurrer to defendant's amended answer having been sustained, without leave to amend, a decree of foreclosure was entered. From this decree defendant appeals on the judgment-roll alone.
The facts material to this controversy as alleged in the complaint are as follows: That on or about the sixth day of July, 1926, George H. Thompson executed and delivered to plaintiffs two certain promissory notes in the respective sums of $250 and $1750. The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Loughborough v. McNevinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Leet v. ArmbrusterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- In re the Estate of RoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Haile v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- German Savings & Loan Society v. HutchinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Walker v. HoustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Lichty v. WhitneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Smith v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979