Legal Opinion

Wiemeyer v. Southern Trust & Commerce Bank

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 9, 1930No. Docket No. 207PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMES, J., pro tem.

Respondents filed a complaint in the Superior Court of San Diego County for the purpose of foreclosing a mortgage upon real property. A demurrer to defendant's amended answer having been sustained, without leave to amend, a decree of foreclosure was entered. From this decree defendant appeals on the judgment-roll alone.

The facts material to this controversy as alleged in the complaint are as follows: That on or about the sixth day of July, 1926, George H. Thompson executed and delivered to plaintiffs two certain promissory notes in the respective sums of $250 and $1750. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Loughborough v. McNevinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Leet v. ArmbrusterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. In re the Estate of RoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Haile v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. German Savings & Loan Society v. HutchinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Walker v. HoustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Lichty v. WhitneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. Smith v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API