Legal Opinion

Smith v. Robinson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 1, 1979No. 50959PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OP ALA, Justice:

In this case we are called upon the answer the following questions: (a) is a landowner’s pre-suit tender to contractor in redemption of the premises from a mechanic’s and materialman’s lien sufficient in law although it fails to include two expense items incurred in the filing of the lien? 1 (b) if the tender so made, though adequate in law, be met with refusal and landowner then discharges the lien by complying with the procedure set forth in 42 O.S.1971 § 147 2 , does the prior tender continue to shield him from liability for court costs, including contractor’s counsel fee,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Smith v. OwensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  2. Liberty Nat. Bank of Weatherford v. SemkoffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. Coursey v. FairchildSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  4. Smith-Wogan Hardware & Imp. Co. v. BiceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Pierson v. American National Bank of ShawneeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Allen v. State Ex Rel. Board of Trustees of the Oklahoma Uniform Retirement System for Justices & JudgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  3. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. BENEFIEL v. BOULTONSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
  5. BENEFIEL v. BOULTONSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API