Legal Opinion
Klamath Siskiyou Wildlands Center v. Babbitt
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided June 12, 2000No. CV99-1044-STPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
STEWART, United States Magistrate Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs, Klamath Siskiyou Wildlands Center, Klamath Forest Alliance, and Native Plant Society of Oregon, filed two separate cases alleging that defendant, Bruce Babbitt, Secretary of the Department of the Interior (“Secretary”), violated the Endangered Species Act, 16 USC §§ 1531-1544 (“ESA”), by failing to publish in the Federal Register final rules for one butterfly species and five plant species within the one year deadline mandated by 16 USC § 1533(b)(6)(A). In October 1999, plaintiffs filed Motions for Summary…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- J.H. McQuiston v. John O. Marsh, Jr., Secretary of the Army, United States Army Missile CommandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Oregon Environmental Council v. KunzmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Victoria Posada v. Lamb County, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Loggerhead Turtle v. County Council of Volusia CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Biodiversity Legal Foundation v. BadgleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- MacDonald v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Biodiversity Legal Foundation v. BadgleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Center for Biological Diversity v. ScarlettDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2006