Legal Opinion

MacDonald v. Ford Motor Co.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided November 2, 2015No. Case No. 13-cv-02988-JSTPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES

JON S. TIGAR, United States District Judge

Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees. ECF No. 69. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant the motion.

I. BACKGROUND

A. Parties and Claims

Plaintiffs Jean MacDonald, Veronica Aguirre, and Brian Barbee bring this putative class action on behalf of individuals who purchased or leased 2005-2008 Ford Escape Hybrid vehicles and/or 2006-2008 Mercury Mariner'Hybrid vehicles (“Class Vehicles”). ECF No. 27. Plaintiffs allege that Class Vehicles equipped with the Motor…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Maria P. v. RilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Graham v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.California Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Colgan v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. North Bay Regional Center v. MaldonadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Victoria Posada v. Lamb County, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bernstein v. Virgin America, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2023
  2. Dept. of Water Resources Environmental Impact CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
  3. Nei Contracting & Engineering v. Hanson Aggregates Pacific SwCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  4. Skinner v. Ken's Foods, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. Taylor v. Shutterfly, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API