Legal Opinion
People v. McHugh
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 7, 2004No. D042148PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McDONALD, J.
Stephen McHugh pleaded guilty to a series of charges after the court denied his motion to suppress evidence of the results of his blood-alcohol test. On appeal, McHugh asserts this evidence should have been suppressed because it was obtained as a result of an improper stop, and the blood draw was improper.
I
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
A. The Arrest
At approximately 9:30 p.m. on April 30, 2002, Officer Rossi of the San Diego City Schools Police Department was driving home in the marked patrol car he used for his work. As he drove northbound on Interstate 15, Rossi saw a car, driven by…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Atwater v. City of Lago VistaSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- People v. WeaverCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. LeybaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Espinoza v. ShiomotoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Hildebrand v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- People v. MateljanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Opinion No. (2008), California Attorney General Reports2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.