People v. Mateljan
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BENKE, Acting P. J.
Since February 11, 2004, Vehicle Code 1 section 23158 has permitted certified phlebotomists to draw blood without direct supervision from a physician or registered nurse from persons suspected of driving under the influence of alcohol. However, each of the appellants in this case was suspected of driving under the influence and taken into custody before February 11, 2004. Each appellant elected to have a blood test rather than a breath test. In each case, although the practice had not yet been authorized by the Legislature, a phlebotomist acting without direct…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Ronald K. Drewitt v. Fred L. Pratt Pizza Hut of America, Inc., City of Norfolk, Party-In-InterestCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Murgia v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. McKayCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- State v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2009
- People v. Fish, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- (HC) Smith v. ClarkDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- People v. Andrews CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.