Legal Opinion

United States v. Durrance

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 18, 1939No. 8821PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLMES, Circuit Judge.

This was a suit to recover damages in the sum of $5,000 for the wrongful death of appellee’s father and mother. It was instituted in the court below under a private act, entitled An Act for the Relief of -Evanell Durrance, approved June 26, 1936 (49 Stat. 2366). From a judgment against it for $4,383.68, entered upon the verdict of a jury, the United States prosecuted this appeal.

The enactment, upon the construction of which our decision depends, is as follows :

“Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Schillinger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. United States v. MichelSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Munro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Duval v. HuntSupreme Court of Florida · 1894

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hubsch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
  2. Rambo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
  3. Mizrahi v. North Miami Medical Center, Ltd.Supreme Court of Florida · 2000
  4. Commissioner v. Webre Steib Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
  5. Stewart v. PriceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API