Hubsch v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WALLER, Circuit Judge.
The Plaintiffs in these two consolidated cases, brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act, were riding in an automobile that came into collision with a jeep belonging to the United States Army and driven by an Army lieutenant. The Court 'below found that although the driver of -the Government’s jeep was guilty of negligence proximately causing the injuries to Plaintiffs, nevertheless, such driver was not acting within the scope of his office or employment at the time of the injuries.
The evidence relied on by the Court was substantial within the contemplation of Rule 52,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Schillinger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
- United States v. MichelSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Munro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Price v. United States & Osage IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Dolcie Lawrence v. Peter Dunbar, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. HullCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1952
- In Re Texas City Disaster LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
- United States v. FotopulosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.