Legal Opinion
Rambo v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided November 14, 1944No. 10959PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALLER, Circuit Judge.
The United States is in possession of, and claims the entire title to, the lands involved in this case by virtue of a proceeding in eminent domain, but the plaintiffs assert that they are tenants in common with the Government, and that the Government owns but a small fraction of the entire title due, they allege, to the fact that the condemnation proceedings were invalid as to them because of the asserted failure of the Government to make them parties defendants in such proceedings.
Jurisdiction in this Court is predicated on subsection 25 of Section 41 of Title 28…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Matthews v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- In Re SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Payne v. HookSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Schillinger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- United States v. MichelSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Hamilton v. NakaiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- Hubsch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
- Hamilton v. NakaiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- Lloyd R. Stubbs, Individually and as Administrator of the Estates of John R. Stubbs and Mary E. Stubbs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- A. C. Chock, Ltd. v. KaneshiroHawaii Supreme Court · 1969
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.