Legal Opinion

State v. Swanson

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 4, 2003No. 28012-4-IIPublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

65 P.3d 343 (2003)

116 Wash.App. 67

STATE of Washington, Respondent,

v.

Sigiel SWANSON, Appellant.

No. 28012-4-II.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

March 4, 2003.

Karen Mccarty Lundahl, Attorney at Law, Tacoma, WA, for Appellant.

John Christopher Hillman, Pierce County Prosecuting Attorney, Tacoma, WA, for Respondent.

BRIDGEWATER, J.

Sigiel Swanson appeals the trial court's decision denying his petition for restoration of his firearm rights. Swanson contends that the court had no discretion to deny his petition once he demonstrated that he had satisfied the several requirements enumerated at…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Rozner v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Berger v. SonnelandWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Berger v. SonnelandWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Washington Natural Gas Co. v. Public Utility District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Stuckey v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State v. DennisWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Payseno v. Kitsap CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  3. State v. MasangkayCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  4. State v. MasangkayCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  5. State v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API