Legal Opinion

Payseno v. Kitsap County

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 17, 2015No. 45389-4-IIPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1

Sutton, J.

Clifford Payseno appeals the superior court’s denial of his petition to restore his right to possess a firearm. We are asked to decide whether the requirement in RCW Si.dl.OdOCdXaXiiXA)1 that a petitioner be crime-free for five years is satisfied by an earlier crime-free period or whether the crime-free period must immediately precede the filing of the petition.

¶2 We hold that RCW 9.41.040(4)(a)(ii)(A) is ambiguous as applied to the facts of this case. The statute can be interpreted as requiring a petitioner to be crime-free for the five-year period immediately preceding the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. State v. DelgadoWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. RoggenkampWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. RoggenkampWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Berger v. SonnelandWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Berger v. SonnelandWashington Supreme Court · 2001

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In re Pers. Restraint of ArnoldWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State Of Washington v. James H. ManuelCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  3. City Of Seattle, Petitioner/cross-respondent v. Steven G. Long, Respondent/cross-petitionerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  4. City Of Seattle, Petitioner/cross-respondent v. Steven G. Long, Respondent/cross-petitionerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  5. Kris & Brigette Kilbourne v. Dept. Of Retirement Systems, State Of WaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API