Maybelline Co. v. Stiles
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Tom Glaze, Judge.
This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Review awarding benefits to the claimant after finding that she was dismissed from her job for reasons other than misconduct in connection with the work. The appellant/employer raises two points for reversal:
A. The Board of Review acted in a manner contrary to law by failing to order a hearing to receive new evidence offered by Maybelline.
B. The Board’s decision is not supported by the evidence and is contrary to law.
We cannot say that the Board erred as a matter of law in not awarding a second hearing at the employer’s…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Harris v. DanielsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
- Arlington Hotel v. Employment Security DivisionCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1981
- Smith v. EverettCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982
- Olson v. EverettCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983
- Jordan v. DukesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sadler v. StilesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1987
- Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. Director of LaborCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
- Fry v. Director of LaborCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985
- Carp Construction v. StilesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1987
- Moore v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.