Legal Opinion

Bonness v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 27, 1927No. 4984PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.

This is a writ of error to review a judgment of conviction under the White Slave Traffic Act (Comp. St. §§ 8812-8819). The indictment charged that the two plaintiffs in error on July 3, 1925, transported two girls, in foreign commerce, from the city of Seattle, in the state of Washington, to the city of Vancouver, in the Dominion of Canada, as passengers in a Chevrolet touring automobile, for the purpose of prostitution, debauchery, concubinage, and other immoral purposes, to wit: That the plaintiff in error Bonness should and would engage in illicit sexual intercourse…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cook v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  2. Kurczak v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926
  3. Bradshaw v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
  4. Shively v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924
  5. Noland v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Paschen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1934
  2. Eddie Rena Hamer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
  3. United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  4. Matthew J. Connelly and T. Lamar Caudle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
  5. Long v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API