Legal Opinion

Matthew J. Connelly and T. Lamar Caudle v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 14, 1959No. 16213_1PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Circuit Judge.

Appellants, with one Harry I. Schwim-mer, were indicted for conspiracy to defraud the United States of the proper administration of Internal Revenue Laws and regulations and of the proper and faithful service of appellants, in violation of Section 371, Title 18 United States Code. We shall refer to appellants as defendants.

In the course of the trial Harry I. Schwimmer, who had been indicted with defendants, suffered a heart attack, whereupon a mistrial was granted as to him and the cause proceeded against the other defendants. The jury returned a verdict of guilty, but…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Weiss v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
  3. Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
  4. Morton Butler Timber Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937
  5. Matthew J. Connelly and T. Lamar Caudle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Ralph Melvin Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
  2. People of Michigan v. Kendrick ScottMichigan Supreme Court · 2018
  3. United States v. Charles W. PopeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
  4. Loyd Carl Ray v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
  5. Harold Lee Batsell v. United States of America, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API