Legal Opinion

Bradshaw v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 15, 1926No. 4924PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRudkin, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). The rulings of the eourt below on the demurrer to the indictment and on the motion to quash are- assigned as error. The basis of the assignment is that tlie government has improperly attempted to carve three crimes out of one. But if the contention is well founded, the plaintiff in error was not prejudiced, because in the end the court imposed but a single sentence as for a single crime on all three counts.

For the purposes of the record, counsel for the plaintiff in error asked permission to examine the jurors individually upon their voir dire. This request…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1926
  2. McDonough v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924
  3. Kurczak v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926
  4. Noland v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
  5. Maki v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Paschen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1934
  2. Yenkichi Ito v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
  3. Madden v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
  4. Chiaravalloti v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932
  5. Heskett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API