Legal Opinion

Noland v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 23, 1926No. 4708PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.

This is a writ of error to review a judgment of conviction under the White Slave Traffic Act (Comp. St. §§ 8812-8819).

At the commencement of the trial, counsel for the plaintiff in error called attention to some new rule of the court, and stated that he desired the record to show that he requested the privilege of examining prospective jurors individually on their voir dire. The court refused this request, but permitted counsel to examine the jurors collectively, or as a whole. In the course of the examination, counsel asked the jurors whether any of them had ever been a…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Paschen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1934
  2. Bradshaw v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
  3. Bonness v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
  4. Aplin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API