In Re Estate of Browne
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
Cora McGarvey and Edith Johns appeal from, that portion of the decree of distribution by which the entire residue of the estate, consisting of about thirty-two thousand two hundred dollars, was distributed absolutely to Clarence W. Browne, a son of the testator, the theory and contention of appellants being that the will of Thomas H. Browne created a precatory trust in their favor.
In the will, after making in direct and positive language eight certain specific bequests to his collateral relatives, the testator used the following language:
“All the rest and residue of my property of every kind,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Marti v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Land v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Thornagel v. PforrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- In Re the Estate of MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Kauffman v. GriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Mallarino v. HammersmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Estate of HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Ferguson v. PattersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
- Fields v. FieldsOregon Supreme Court · 1931
- In Re Estate of SowashCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.