Legal Opinion

Marti v. Anderson

California Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1901No. S.F. No. 1872PublishedCited by 73 opinions

APPEAL from a decree of the Superior Court of Sonoma County distributing the estate of a deceased person. Albert G. Burnett, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court in Department One.

1Opinion of the Court

The appeal herein was originally heard in Department One, and an opinion filed therein, upon which an order was made reversing the judgment of the superior court. Upon the petition of the respondents, a rehearing was granted, and the cause was afterwards argued before the court in Bank. The opinion rendered in Department is now adopted by the court in Bank, and for the reasons therein stated the judgment is reversed and the superior court is directed to enter a decree distributing the entire residue of the estate to the appellant.

McFarland, J., Van Dyke, J., and Garoutte, J., concurred.

The…

2Cited by73 opinions

  1. Estate of RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Hembree v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Church Home for Children of Protestant Episcopal Church v. LawrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Salmonski v. BardzinskiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Thornagel v. PforrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API