Legal Opinion
Mallarino v. Hammersmith
California Supreme Court
Decided December 21, 1950No. S. F. 17748PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.
This appeal is taken by Marjorie Mallarino and Lois Graham from an order of the probate court which instructed respondent executrix with respect to the interpretation of the holographic will of George A. Kearns, the material portions of which are as follows:
“1—I hereby bequeath to my beloved and devoted flaneé Emma Traung Hammersmith of the City and County of San Francisco, California, all my real and personal property and belongings that I possess or are dne me of whatsoever nature.
“2—I hereby appoint my flaneé Emma Traung Hammer-smith sole executor of my Estate and to perform such duties…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Colton v. ColtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Tomaier v. TomaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Lawless v. CalawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Church Home for Children of Protestant Episcopal Church v. LawrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Heimann v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
- Estate of RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Hembree v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Torregano v. TorreganoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Beneficial Fire & Casualty Insurance v. Kurt Hitke & Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.