State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Eloisa Rubi Plancarte, Appellant
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1. To “lewdly” expose oneself in violation of Minnesota Statutes section 617.23, subdivision 1(1) (2024), a person must engage in conduct of a sexual nature. 2. The State did not present evidence sufficient to prove that the appellant “lewdly” exposed her “body, or the private parts thereof” under section 617.23, subdivision 1(1), because the record does not show that the appellant engaged in conduct of a sexual nature. Reversed.
1Opinion of the Court
STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A23-0158 Court of Appeals Procaccini, J. Concurring, Hennesy, Procaccini, JJ. Took no part, Gaïtas, J. State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Filed: April 30, 2025 Office of Appellate Courts Eloisa Rubi Plancarte, Appellant. ________________________ Keith Ellison, Attorney General, Saint Paul, Minnesota; and Michael T. Walters, Olmsted County Attorney, James E. Haase, Senior Assistant County Attorney, Rochester, Minnesota, for respondent. Cathryn Middlebrook, Chief Appellate Public Defender, Adam Lozeau, Assistant State Public Defender, Saint Paul, Minnesota,…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Hill v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Osborne v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.