Legal Opinion

Chicago, Terre Haute & Southeastern Railway Co. v. Collins

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 31, 1915No. 8,483Published

Prom Greene Circuit Court; Charles E. Henderson, Judge. Action by Goldie Collins, by her next friend, James S. James, against the Chicago, Terre Haute and Southeastern Railway Company. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion

On Petition for Rehearing.

Caldwell, J.

7. Appellant, on petition for a rehearing, earnestly insists that the court erroneously held by the original opinion that appellant waived the assignment that the court erred in overruling the motion for judgment on the answers of the jury to the interrogatories notwithstanding the general verdict. Clause 5, Rule 22 provides, among other things, that appellant’s brief shall contain “under a separate heading of each error relied on, separately numbered propositions or points, stated concisely”, etc. An inspection of appellant’s original brief readily…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stewart v. StewartIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Stauffer v. HulwickIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Owen v. HarriottIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. Town of Clarksville v. Ohio Falls Hydraulic Manufacturing Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API