Legal Opinion

David H. Mitchell v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 31, 1955No. 14711_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Chief Judge.

This case is before us for the second time pursuant to a judgment of the United States Supreme Court which vacated the judgment of this court and remanded it “for consideration in the light of Holland v. United States [348 U.S. 121, 75 S.Ct. 127], Friedberg v. United States [348 U.S. 142, 75 S.Ct. 138], Smith v. United States [348 U.S. 147, 75 S.Ct. 194], and United States v. Calderon [348 U.S. 160, 75 S.Ct. 186]. We have not considered the merits of these cases, nor have we determined their relationship to our recent opinions, supra, believing that reexamination by the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. United States v. CalderonSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Finnegan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953
  5. Friedberg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Eddie B. Kleven and Maynard W. Maetzold v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957
  2. John Jacob Bram v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955
  3. John P. Kampmeyer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955
  4. David H. Mitchell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API