Legal Opinion

Eddie B. Kleven and Maynard W. Maetzold v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 26, 1957No. 15645PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITTAKER, Circuit Judge.

Appellants, Kleven and Maetzold, were severally charged, in separate counts of an indictment, with having violated Section 545, Title 18 U.S.C., in the District of North Dakota, through dealings alleged to have been had by them in and with certain Selkirk seed wheat, known by them to have been unlawfully brought from Canada into the United States. The pertinent provisions of that statute .are:

“Whoever fraudulently or knowingly imports or brings into the United States, any merchandise contrary to law, or receives, conceals, buys, sells, or in any manner facilitates the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Holt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Allis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Finnegan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953
  4. Winebrenner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
  5. McHenry v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1921

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Billie Sol Estes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
  2. Anthony Cardarella v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
  3. John Michael Williamson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  4. United States v. LeachCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
  5. Loren R. Gajewski and Mervin A. Gajewski v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API