Legal Opinion

Cooper v. Deseret Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided July 6, 1988No. 880028-CAPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BILLINGS, Judge:

Deseret Federal Savings and Loan Association (“Deseret”) appeals from the trial court’s decision which barred Deseret from enforcing the due-on-sale option of the parties’ trust deed and ordered Deseret to pay Cooper’s attorney fees. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Deseret and Cooper executed a trust deed to secure a $315,000 note. The deed contains a due-on-sale option, which provides in pertinent part:

If all or any part of the property interest or an interest therein is sold or transferred by Borrower [Cooper] without Lender’s [Deseret’s] prior written consent,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Toledo v. Perry's Landing, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Malouff v. Midland Federal Savings and Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  3. Jorgensen v. John Clay and Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Dunham v. Ware Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  5. F. M. A. Financial Corp. v. Build, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Carr v. Enoch Smith Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  2. Stacey Properties v. WixenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
  3. Estate of Schmidt Ex Rel. Schmidt v. DownsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  4. Anglin v. Contracting Fabrication MacHining, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2001
  5. Bell v. ElderCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API