Legal Opinion

Stacey Properties v. Wixen

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided December 20, 1988No. 880127-CAPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BENCH, Judge:

Plaintiff appeals from final judgment on an action to accelerate the balance due on a promissory note. Defendants appeal from final judgment on their counterclaim for breaches of warranty and contract. There are three issues presented for review. First, did the trial court err in dismissing plaintiff’s claim for acceleration of the balance owed on the promissory note? Second, did the court err in measuring damages to be awarded defendants on their counterclaim? Third, did the court err in failing to award attorney fees? We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

This dispute…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. Pearson EnterprisesUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Trayner v. CushingUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Robbins v. FinlayUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Alexander v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Ted R. Brown & Associates, Inc. v. Carnes Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Mountain States Broadcasting Co. v. NealeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  2. Brown v. RichardsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1992
  3. Cobabe v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  4. Occidental/Nebraska Federal Savings Bank v. MehrCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  5. Mountain States Broadcasting Co. v. NealeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API