Legal Opinion

Estate of Schmidt Ex Rel. Schmidt v. Downs

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided May 24, 1989No. 870491-CAPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GREENWOOD, Judge:

Appellants, Keith Downs and Albert Sa-none, challenge the trial court’s ruling regarding a real estate purchase contract which Downs and Sanone entered into with Theodore G. and Marion M. Schmidt (the Schmidts). The trial court found that an interlineation in the contract was not agreed to or initialed by Marion M. Schmidt and that she, therefore, was not bound by the interlineated price. On appeal, appellants urge reversal, claiming that Marion Schmidt is bound by the interlineation and that appellants are entitled to purchase the property at the interlineated price.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. WalkerUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Resource Management Co. v. Weston RanchUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Kimball v. CampbellUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Zions First National Bank, N.A. v. National American Title Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Buehner Block Co. v. UWC ASSOCIATESUtah Supreme Court · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. West Texas Transmission, L.P. v. Enron CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  2. Cobabe v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  3. Matter of Estate of BurgessCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1992
  4. Fairbourn Commercial, Inc. v. American Housing Partners, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2003
  5. Bischoff v. Bletz, Sr., Van Guilder and WhiteSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API