Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. Purcell v. MWI Corp.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 14, 2011No. Civil Action 98-2088 (RMU)PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Granting the Government’s Motion to Strike the Declaration of John Stephen Fancher; Granting the Government’s Motion to Strike the Disclosure and Declaration of James Moorhouse; Denying the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment; Denying the Government’s Motion for Summary Judgment; Denying the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the Relator’s Complaint

RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter concerns allegations that Moving Water Industries, Inc. (“MWI”) defrauded the federal government by fraudulently concealing bribes made to its sales agents in Nigeria.…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Pencheng Si v. Laogai Research Foundation FoundationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  2. Barnes v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  3. United States Ex Rel. Purcell v. MWI Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
  4. Thorpe v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  5. United States Ex Rel. Hood v. Satory Global, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API