Legal Opinion

Openshaw v. Young

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1944No. 6674PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLFE, Chief Justice.

The respondent has moved to dismiss the appeal on the grounds that there was no final judgment entered from which an appeal could be taken. It is necessary to an understanding of the questions raised by the motion to set forth the chronology of the case.

The respondent, Clarence R. Openshaw, was adjudged by the District Court of Salt Lake County to be guilty of contempt of court for refusing to comply with an order of the court relating to the payment of alimony. He was sentenced to serve a term in the county jail. The same day the District Court, through a different…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Attorney General of Utah v. PomeroyUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Oldroyd v. McCreaUtah Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co v. CleggUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Larsen v. MartinOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Flynn v. FlynnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Adamson v. District Court of the Fourth Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Openshaw v. YoungUtah Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Openshaw v. YoungUtah Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Walker Center Corp. v. State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API