Legal Opinion

In re Mitsui & Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 1, 1933PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BONDY, District Judge.

This is a petition by the owner of the steamship Horaisan Maru for exemption from or limitation of liability for cargo loss.

The Horaisan Maru arrived at Grays Harbor, Wash., on or about February 20, 1926. She finished loading at Schaefer’s Dolphins, on the Chehalis river, which empties into Grays Harbor, March 3, 1926, at about 2 p. m. The deck lashings were completed at about 9 o’clock the next morning. She sailed at 12:15 p. m. March 4th, and proceeded on her way through the harbor along a narrow dredged channel, reaching the bar at the mouth of the harbor at about…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. International Navigation Co. v. Farr & Bailey Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Steamship Willdomino v. Citro Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. The WildcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  4. Craig v. Continental InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Earle & Stoddart, Inc. v. Ellerman's Wilson Line, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. The SchickshinnyDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1942
  2. The WillowpoolDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1935
  3. The MariaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1936
  4. John W. Higman & Co. v. Pool Shipping Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1935
  5. Atlantic Mut. Ins. v. Cosulich Societa Triestina Di NavigazioneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API