Legal Opinion

The Maria

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 9, 1936PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

15 F.Supp. 745 (1936)

THE MARIA.

ATLANTIC MUT. INS. CO. et al.

v.

COSULICH SOCIETA TRIESTINA DI NAVIGAZIONE, and three other cases.

District Court, S. D. New York.

July 9, 1936.

Bigham, Englar, Jones & Houston, of New York City (Henry N. Longley and Ezra G. Benedict Fox, both of New York City, of counsel), for libelants.

Loomis, Williams & Donahue, of New York City (Homer L. Loomis, of New York City, of counsel), for claimant-respondent.

HULBERT, District Judge.

These are four suits in admiralty tried together.

Claimant is the owner of the motor vessel Maria, a ship engaged in the carriage of general…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. May v. Hamburg-Amerikanische Packetfahrt AktiengesellschaftSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. The JasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. The Benjamin NobleDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1916
  4. United States Steel Products Co. v. American & Foreign Ins.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  5. The WillowpoolDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. The MariaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
  2. The S. S. AsturiasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1941
  3. The Ww BruceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
  4. Weyerhauser Timber Co. v. Continental S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
  5. A. A. Schade, Doing Business as Schade & Company, Libelant-Appellant v. National Surety Corporation and Continental Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API