Legal Opinion
The Willowpool
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 6, 1935PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
12 F.Supp. 96 (1935)
THE WILLOWPOOL.
JOHN W. HIGMAN & CO., Inc.,
v.
POOL SHIPPING CO., Limited, et al.
District Court, S. D. New York.
September 6, 1935.
Hill & Rivkins, of New York City (Robert E. Hill, of New York City, of counsel), for libelant.
Kirlin, Campbell, Hickox, Keating & McGrann, of New York City (Michael F. Whalen, of New York City, of counsel), for respondents.
HULBERT, District Judge.
This is a suit in admiralty to recover damages to a shipment of china clay and ball clay.
The libelant is a corporation organized under the laws of the state of New York, engaged in the importing business…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- La BourgogneSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Clifton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1846
- M. Binkovitz & Sons, Inc. v. Compania TransatlanticaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1935
- In re Mitsui & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1933
- John W. Higman & Co. v. Pool Shipping Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Waterman S. S. Corp. v. United States Smelting, Refining & Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
- Mississippi Shipping Co., Inc., Claimant-Appellant v. Zander and Company, Inc., Libellants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- The MariaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1936
- American Mail Line Ltd. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1974
- Zander & Co. v. Mississippi Shipping Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.