Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. Commerce Tankers Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 11, 1969No. 67 Civ. 2274PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LEVET, District Judge.
This is a motion for judgment N.O.V. for defendants after a Special Verdict holding defendants liable to plaintiff for negligence in a seaman’s action for personal injuries. A copy of the Special Verdict is hereto appended. Under Rule 42(b), liability was tried first.
Also, at the conclusion of the trial on damages in the above-entitled action (1) plaintiff moved to set aside the verdict as inadequate; and (2) defendants moved to set aside the same verdict as excessive and as inconsistent. Subsequently, the plaintiff withdrew his motion.
*1238In the pretrial…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Cortes v. Baltimore Insular Line, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Ferguson v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Neely v. Martin K. Eby Construction Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- John Traupman v. American Dredging CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. SS PolarlandDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
- Quam v. Mobil Oil Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
- Kalogeros v. BrasileiroDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978
- Collins v. CravenDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.