Legal Opinion
Quam v. Mobil Oil Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 23, 1978No. 76 Civ. 3035 (RWS)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWEET, District Judge:
The history of the pleadings and claims of the plaintiff, widow of the deceased seaman, first assistant engineer of the Mobil Chicago, is as follows. The plaintiff sued Mobil Oil Corporation, owner of Mobil Chicago, pursuant to the Jones Act and in admiralty. Mobil then impleaded the dock, Perth Amboy Dock Co., asserting admiralty jurisdiction based upon a maritime contract. Perth then impleaded Interstate Industrial Protection Co. Inc., its security guard service, seeking indemnity for any liability it had to Mobil. At the close of discovery, Mobil made a motion to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Schulz v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Carbone v. Ursich the Del RioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- Ernest A. Armstrong v. Commerce Tankers Corp. And Empire Ship Agents & Brokers Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Wiper v. Great Lakes Engineering WorksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
- Wheeler v. West India S. S. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kathy L. Joiner, Etc. v. Diamond M Drilling Co. And Halliburton Company, and Third-Party v. Dr. C. Babson Fresh, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Ugarte v. United States Lines, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Florida Fuels, Inc. v. Citgo Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Florida Fuels, Inc. v. Citgo Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Ugarte v. United States Lines, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1983