Legal Opinion
Daines v. Markoff
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided October 20, 1976No. 8499, 8625 and 8729PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*584OPINION
By the Court,
Thompson, J.:
The above-entitled cases have been consolidated for appeal since each concerns the award of fees to court appointed counsel for persons charged with criminal offenses.
*585In case No. 8499 the district court directed Clark County to pay fees to court appointed attorneys Markoff and Boyers in excess of the statutory limit then in existence. Markoff and Boyers represented Albert Oneal Scott charged with noncapital murder and attempted murder. NRS 7.260, since amended, then limited compensation for counsel to “$300 for services in the district court unless the crime…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. RushSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
- United States v. Edward J. Dillon, Petition of Manley B. StrayerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- People Ex Rel. Conn v. RandolphIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
- State Ex Rel. Culinary Workers Union, Local No. 226 v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1949
- Lindh v. O'HARASupreme Court of Delaware · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Stephan v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
- J. D. Williamson, Jr. v. Paul E. Vardeman, Judge of Jackson County, and Susan StantonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- Select Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- State Industrial Insurance System v. SleeperNevada Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. AlliesMontana Supreme Court · 1979
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.