Wiley v. Verhaest
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Morris, J., entered December 9, 1907, upon findings in favor of the plaintiffs, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action for the specific performance of a contract to sell land.
1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.
This action was commenced by N. C. Wiley and Sallie F. Wiley, his wife, against Victor Verhaest, his wife, H. A. Harris, H. A. Harris as administrator of the *476estate of K. B. Hams, deceased, Zera Harris, a minor, and Muryl Harris, a minor, to quiet title and to enforce the specific performance of a contract to sell real estate. On July 13, 1907, after the administration proceedings hereinafter mentioned, plaintiffs entered into a written contract to sell to Victor Verhaest lot 5, in block 51, T. Hanford’s addition to the city of Seattle, for $2,475. The defendant Victor Verhaest paid $50 Cash…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ryan v. FergussonWashington Supreme Court · 1891
- Sadler v. NieszWashington Supreme Court · 1892
- Hill v. YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1893
- Smith v. FerryWashington Supreme Court · 1893
- In re Estate of CannonWashington Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by4 opinions
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. LarsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
- Koloff v. Chicago, Milwaukee & Puget Sound Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- Stanton v. Everett Trust & Savings BankWashington Supreme Court · 1927
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. LarsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942