Sadler v. Niesz
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, Kitsap County.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Stiles, J.
This case was tried as an action at law by the court without a jury. The findings of fact and conclusions of law made by the court, as well as the exceptions to the findings taken by both sides, would appear from notes made upon the papers to have been prepared July 15, 1891, but none of them seem to have been filed with the clerk until August 10, of the same year, and the clerk so certifies. In an action at law tried by the court no judgment can be rendered until the findings have been filed. Code Proc., §379. Therefore, in this case no…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Patty v. MiddletonTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Brotton v. LangertWashington Supreme Court · 1890
- Edwards v. BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1887
- Bennett v. MattinglyIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Holyoke v. Jackson, Washington Territory1882
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Daly v. RizzuttoWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Rowe v. JamesWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Dane v. DanielWashington Supreme Court · 1900
- Rice v. McCarthyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Ewald v. HuftonIdaho Supreme Court · 1918
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.