Legal Opinion
Diaz v. Farley
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 27, 2000No. 98-4136PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
Drs. Diaz, Diehl, and Kaminsky (collectively, the “plaintiffs”) are anesthesiologists with privileges at Cottonwood Hospital in Murray, Utah. They brought an antitrust suit against three other anesthesiologists with privileges at Cottonwood, Drs. Farley, Matthews, and Abele (collectively, the “individual defendants”), and against two entities, Cottonwood Obstetrics & Gynecology & Infertility (“Cottonwood Ob/Gyn”) and Old Farm Obstetrics & Gynecology (“Old Farm Ob/Gyn”). The plaintiffs alleged that the individual defendants engaged in a horizontal group boycott that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Continental T. v. Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Northwest Wholesale Stationers, Inc. v. Pacific Stationery & Printing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Kathy L. Kaul v. Robert T. Stephan, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Champagne Metals v. Ken-Mac Metals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Cohlmia, Jr. v. St. John Medical Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Campfield v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Tunica Web Advertising v. Tunica Casino Operators Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- Suture Express, Inc. v. Cardinal Health 200, LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.