Legal Opinion

Campfield v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 15, 2008No. 06-1442, 06-1467, 06-1469PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCONNELL, Circuit Judge.

Richard Campfield is both an owner of an auto-glass repair shop and the holder of fourteen patents for processes to repair or prevent windshield cracks. He believes, contrary to industry practice, that it is feasible — indeed, safer — to repair many windshield cracks between six and eighteen inches long rather than to replace the windshield. In 2003, apparently exasperated with his lack of success in persuading auto insurance companies to change their auto-glass repair policies, Mr. Campfield brought suit against State Farm Insurance Company and its agent, Lynx…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Tampa Electric Co. v. Nashville Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Business Electronics Corp. v. Sharp Electronics Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Olson v. Major League BaseballCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022
  2. Little Rock Cardiology Clinic PA v. Baptist HealthCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  3. Skrzypczak v. Roman Catholic Diocese of TulsaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  4. Lenox MacLaren Surgical Corp. v. Medtronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  5. Auraria Student Housing at the Regency, LLC v. Campus Village Apartments, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API