Suture Express, Inc. v. Cardinal Health 200, LLC
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
RICHARD D. ROGERS, District Judge.
This is an antitrust action raising federal and state law claims. This ease is before the court upon the motions to dismiss for failure to state a claim (Doc. Nos. 23 and 27) filed by defendant Owens & Minor Distribution, Inc. and defendant Cardinal Health 200, LLC.1 Thus, the question for the court is whether plausible antitrust law violations and state law claims are described in plaintiffs first amended complaint. The court finds that: the first amended complaint does not allege per se antitrust violations or monopolization violations;…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In re EpipenDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2018
- Suture Express, Inc. v. Owens & Minor Distribution, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Gross v. WrightDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Allergy Research Group v. Rez CandlesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2022
- Federal Trade Commission v. Facebook Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2021
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.