State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Michael Lee Vick, Appellant
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
When the state relies on a business record to establish the amount and items of restitution, Minn. R. Evid. 1101(c) allows the state to establish foundation for the record under Minn.
Read the full summary
When the state relies on a business record to establish the amount and items of restitution, Minn. R. Evid. 1101(c) allows the state to establish foundation for the record under Minn. R. Evid. 803(6) by showing, through testimony, affidavit, or proper attestation of the record custodian or other qualified witness, that (1) the records were kept in the course of a regularly conducted business activity, (2) it was a regular practice of the business to make the records, and (3) the records were made at or near the time by or based on information from a person with knowledge of the material…
1Opinion of the Court
STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A25-0163 State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Michael Lee Vick, Appellant. Filed October 13, 2025 Reversed and remanded Wheelock, Judge Clay County District Court File No. 14-CR-23-3898 Keith Ellison, Attorney General, St. Paul, Minnesota; and Brian J. Melton, Clay County Attorney, Caitlin Rose Hurlock, Assistant County Attorney, Moorhead, Minnesota (for respondent) Cathryn Middlebrook, Chief Appellate Public Defender, John Patrick Monnens, Assistant Public Defender, St. Paul, Minnesota (for appellant) Considered and decided by Wheelock, Presiding Judge;…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. EckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- State of Minnesota v. Mahdi Hassan AliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- State Ex Rel. Norgaard v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- State v. GraysonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- State v. GuzmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.