Legal Opinion
Kasten v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp.
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Decided June 19, 2008No. 07-cv-686-bbcPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
BARBARA B. CRABB, District Judge.
In December 2007 plaintiff Kevin Kasten filed this civil action alleging that defendant Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corporation’s decision to terminate plaintiffs employment was a form of retaliation against him in violation of 29 U.S.C. § 215(a)(8). Jurisdiction is present. 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Currently before the court is defendant’s motion for summary judgment, which will be granted. I conclude that plaintiff did not engage in any protected activity listed in § 215(a)(3). From both parties’ proposed findings of fact, I find that the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lambert v. AckerleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Linda Love v. Re/max of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- William Sapperstein v. Robert Hager and Patricia Hager Doing Business as B & G CycleryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Elaine Valerio v. Putnam Associates IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Romeo Community Schools American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Local 2614Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kasten v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Kasten v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Kasten v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011