Legal Opinion
Basch v. Talley Industries, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 1, 1971No. 70 Civ. 4144PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GURFEIN, District Judge.
OPINION
This is a motion by plaintiffs for an order pursuant to Rule 23(c) (1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (1) determining that the first, second, fourth and fifth claims in the amended complaint can be maintained as a class action and (2) providing for the requisite notice at the expense of defendant Talley Industries, Inc. (Industries). The background of this action and the essence of the amended complaint herein were stated by Judge Metzner in denying a motion to dismiss the above mentioned claims.1 Judge Metzner summarized the complaint as follows:
“This…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Leo Vine v. Beneficial Finance Company, Inc., and Charles H. Dowd, Stuart A. Wixson, George J. Springer, C. H. Donohue and Crown Finance Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Bernard v. Beneficial Finance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Hoover v. AllenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- Mader v. ArmelCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Denny v. BarberCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Denny v. BarberCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Weiner v. Bank of King of PrussiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- In Re Caesars Palace Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- Billet v. Storage Technology Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.